RESUMO
Menstruation is a monthly shedding of the uterine wall, presented by menstrual bleeding in women of reproductive age. Menstruation is regulated by fluctuation of estrogen and progesterone, as well as other endocrine and immune pathways. Many women experienced menstrual disturbances after vaccination against the novel coronavirus in the last two years. Vaccine-induced menstrual disturbances have led to discomfort and concern among reproductive-age women, such that some decided not to receive the subsequent doses of the vaccine. Although many vaccinated women report these menstrual disturbances, the mechanism is still poorly understood. This review article discusses the endocrine and immune changes following COVID-19 vaccination and the possible mechanisms of vaccine-related menstrual disturbances.
RESUMO
Background and Objectives: Since the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic began, several vaccines have been manufactured to subside it. This study aimed to determine the prevalence of side effects after injecting common COVID-19 vaccines available in Iran. Materials and Methods: This cross-sectional study was accomplished on Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences (Tehran, Iran) employees during January and September 2022. Eligible participants were selected based on the simple random method and interviewed about side effects after injecting COVID-19 vaccine. Results: The mean age of 656 participants was 38.03 ± 9.53 years, and 453 (69.1%) were female. The prevalence of post-vaccination side effects was higher after receiving the first dose (53.2%) than the second (35.9%) and third (49.4%) doses. Across all three vaccine doses, the overall proportion of side effects was higher following AstraZeneca than the others. The most common side effect after the first dose of the vaccine was myalgia (41.9%), followed by fever (36.6%), chills (31.6%), local reactions (27.0%), headache (25.5%), and sweating (21.6%). People experienced mainly myalgia (23.3%) and fever (20.3%) after injecting the second dose of the vaccine. Additionally, the participants had myalgia (37.2%), fever (30.8%), chills (29.2%), local reactions (26.0%), and headache (24.4%) after the third dose of the vaccine. Conclusion: AstraZeneca had a higher proportion of post-vaccination adverse effects than Sputnik V, Pastocovac, and Sinopharm. The most common side effects were flu-like syndrome and local reactions at the injection site. Furthermore, people rarely experienced life-threatening side effects. Thus, the available COVID-19 vaccines in Iran are safe. [ FROM AUTHOR] Copyright of Iranian Journal of Microbiology is the property of Tehran University of Medical Sciences and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full . (Copyright applies to all s.)
RESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is associated with immune system dysfunction and makes patients vulnerable to opportunistic infections. This report presents a patient with a history of COVID-19, suffering from opportunistic infections. CASE DESCRIPTION: We reported a 64-year-old man complaining of progressive visual loss in his left eye, who had previously been hospitalized for three weeks due to COVID-19. In the ophthalmologic assessment, large foci of dense subretinal and intraretinal infiltrations involving the macula were observed (compatible with endogenous fungal endophthalmitis). Real-time PCR result of intraocular fluid was positive for Candida spp. During subsequent hospitalization, the patient also suffered from fever and productive coughs (manifestations of pneumonia caused by Aspergillus fumigatus and Pneumocystis jirovecii). In response to antibiotic therapy, the fever and coughs subsided, and the ocular examination revealed a dramatic decrease in the size of retinal infiltrations. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with severe COVID-19, long-term ICU admission and immunosuppressive drugs lead to immune system dysfunction and make the patient more susceptible to opportunistic infections. Consequently, fungal pathogens such as Aspergillus, Pneumocystis jirovecii, and Candida spp. may cause infection in different body organs. Thus, clinicians should be alert and have clinical suspicion to diagnose accurately and manage patients accordingly.
RESUMO
Combined variable immunodeficiency (CVID) is a primary immunodeficiency, characterized by impairment in immune system function. These patients are susceptible to opportunistic infections, which may mimic COVID-19 manifestations. Also, misdiagnosis or delayed diagnosis of opportunistic infections can lead to perilous consequences. We report a 28-year-old woman with a history of combined variable immunodeficiency disorder (CVID) and ulcerative colitis (UC) complained of fever, cough, and dyspnea. According to the clinical and radiological manifestations and the COVID-19 epidemic, she was admitted with a primary diagnosis of COVID-19 pneumonia. After a week, the patient did not respond to treatment, so she underwent bronchoscopy. Using polymerase chain reaction (PCR) methodology, we detected DNA of Pneumocystis jirovecii, the causative agent of a life-threatening pneumonia (PCP), in respiratory specimens. The patient was hypersensitive to common PCP treatments, so she was treated with high-dose clindamycin. However, the patient's clinical condition aggravated. Besides, we found evidence of pneumothorax, pneumomediastinum, and pneumopericardium in chest CT scan. We inserted a catheter for the patient to evacuate the air inside the mediastinum. Also, we added caspofungin to the treatment. The patient eventually recovered and was discharged from the hospital about a week later. Thus, during the COVID-19 epidemic, in febrile patients with respiratory symptoms, physicians should not think only of COVID-19. They must consider opportunistic infections such as PCP, especially in immunocompromised patients.
RESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Since the emergence of the novel coronavirus, herbal medicine has been considered a treatment for COVID-19 patients. This study was done to determine the efficacy of olive leaf extract on the outcomes of COVID-19 patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This randomized, triple-blinded clinical trial was conducted on hospitalized COVID-19 patients. Using block randomization, eligible patients were allocated to the following groups: intervention A received olive leaf extract (250 mg every 12 hours for five days), intervention B received olive leaf extract (500 mg every 12 hours for five days), and the control group received placebo (every 12 hours for five days). The outcomes (vital signs, laboratory tests, and length of hospitalization) were compared by group. RESULTS: Of the 150 patients randomized into groups, 141 completed the follow-up and were analyzed. On the fifth day of hospitalization, body temperature (MD=0.34, P<0.001), pulse rate (MD=5.42, P=0.016), respiratory rate (MD=1.66, P=0.001), ESR (MD=13.55, P<0.001), and CRP (MD=15.68, P<0.001) of intervention A were significantly lower than the control group, while oxygen saturation (MD= -1.81, P=0.001) of intervention A was significantly higher than the control group. Furthermore, body temperature (MD=0.30, P=0.001), pulse rate (MD=5.29, P=0.022), respiratory rate (MD=1.41, P=0.006), ESR (MD=14.79, P<0.001), and CRP (MD=16.28, P<0.001) of intervention B were significantly lower than the control group, while oxygen saturation (MD= -2.38, P<0.001) of intervention B was significantly higher than the control group. CONCLUSION: Olive leaf extract can improve the clinical status of the patients and decrease the length of hospitalization.
RESUMO
Combined variable immunodeficiency (CVID) is a primary immunodeficiency, characterized by impairment in immune system function. These patients are susceptible to opportunistic infections, which may mimic COVID-19 manifestations. Also, misdiagnosis or delayed diagnosis of opportunistic infections can lead to perilous consequences. We report a 28-year-old woman with a history of combined variable immunodeficiency disorder (CVID) and ulcerative colitis (UC) complained of fever, cough, and dyspnea. According to the clinical and radiological manifestations and the COVID-19 epidemic, she was admitted with a primary diagnosis of COVID-19 pneumonia. After a week, the patient did not respond to treatment, so she underwent bronchoscopy. Using polymerase chain reaction (PCR) methodology, we detected DNA of Pneumocystis jirovecii, the causative agent of a life-threatening pneumonia (PCP), in respiratory specimens. The patient was hypersensitive to common PCP treatments, so she was treated with high-dose clindamycin. However, the patient's clinical condition aggravated. Besides, we found evidence of pneumothorax, pneumomediastinum, and pneumopericardium in chest CT scan. We inserted a catheter for the patient to evacuate the air inside the mediastinum. Also, we added caspofungin to the treatment. The patient eventually recovered and was discharged from the hospital about a week later. Thus, during the COVID-19 epidemic, in febrile patients with respiratory symptoms, physicians should not think only of COVID-19. They must consider opportunistic infections such as PCP, especially in immunocompromised patients.